This MVP release provides a complete full-stack solution for managing action mappings in Geutebruck's GeViScope and GeViSoft video surveillance systems. ## Features ### Flutter Web Application (Port 8081) - Modern, responsive UI for managing action mappings - Action picker dialog with full parameter configuration - Support for both GSC (GeViScope) and G-Core server actions - Consistent UI for input and output actions with edit/delete capabilities - Real-time action mapping creation, editing, and deletion - Server categorization (GSC: prefix for GeViScope, G-Core: prefix for G-Core servers) ### FastAPI REST Backend (Port 8000) - RESTful API for action mapping CRUD operations - Action template service with comprehensive action catalog (247 actions) - Server management (G-Core and GeViScope servers) - Configuration tree reading and writing - JWT authentication with role-based access control - PostgreSQL database integration ### C# SDK Bridge (gRPC, Port 50051) - Native integration with GeViSoft SDK (GeViProcAPINET_4_0.dll) - Action mapping creation with correct binary format - Support for GSC and G-Core action types - Proper Camera parameter inclusion in action strings (fixes CrossSwitch bug) - Action ID lookup table with server-specific action IDs - Configuration reading/writing via SetupClient ## Bug Fixes - **CrossSwitch Bug**: GSC and G-Core actions now correctly display camera/PTZ head parameters in GeViSet - Action strings now include Camera parameter: `@ PanLeft (Comment: "", Camera: 101028)` - Proper filter flags and VideoInput=0 for action mappings - Correct action ID assignment (4198 for GSC, 9294 for G-Core PanLeft) ## Technical Stack - **Frontend**: Flutter Web, Dart, Dio HTTP client - **Backend**: Python FastAPI, PostgreSQL, Redis - **SDK Bridge**: C# .NET 8.0, gRPC, GeViSoft SDK - **Authentication**: JWT tokens - **Configuration**: GeViSoft .set files (binary format) ## Credentials - GeViSoft/GeViScope: username=sysadmin, password=masterkey - Default admin: username=admin, password=admin123 ## Deployment All services run on localhost: - Flutter Web: http://localhost:8081 - FastAPI: http://localhost:8000 - SDK Bridge gRPC: localhost:50051 - GeViServer: localhost (default port) Generated with Claude Code (https://claude.com/claude-code) Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2.5 KiB
2.5 KiB
CRITICAL BUG FIX - DeleteActionMapping Cascade Deletion
Date: 2025-12-16
Severity: CRITICAL - Data Loss
Summary
DeleteActionMapping operation caused cascade deletion of ~54 action mappings during testing, reducing total from ~60 to only 6 mappings.
Root Cause
When deleting multiple action mappings, IDs shift after each deletion. Deleting in ascending order causes wrong mappings to be deleted.
Example of the Bug:
Original mappings: #1, #2, #3, #4, #5
Want to delete: #3, #4, #5
Delete #3 → Mappings become: #1, #2, #3(was 4), #4(was 5)
Delete #4 → Deletes what was originally #5! ✗
Delete #5 → Deletes wrong mapping! ✗
The Fix
Always delete in REVERSE order (highest ID first):
WRONG (causes cascade deletion):
for mapping in mappings_to_delete:
delete_action_mapping(mapping['id']) # ✗ WRONG
CORRECT:
# Sort by ID descending
sorted_mappings = sorted(mappings_to_delete, key=lambda x: x['id'], reverse=True)
for mapping in sorted_mappings:
delete_action_mapping(mapping['id']) # ✓ CORRECT
Files Fixed
comprehensive_crud_test.py- Lines 436-449- Added reverse sorting before deletion loop
- Added comment explaining why reverse order is critical
Testing Required
Before using DeleteActionMapping in production:
- ✅ Restore configuration from backup (TestMKS_original.set)
- ✅ Test delete operation with fixed code
- ✅ Verify only intended mappings are deleted
- ✅ Verify count before/after matches expected delta
Impact Assessment
- Affected Environment: Development/Test only
- Production Impact: NONE (bug caught before production deployment)
- Data Loss: ~54 test action mappings (recoverable from backup)
Prevention Measures
- Code Review: All delete-by-index operations must be reviewed
- Testing: Always verify delete operations with read-after-delete
- Documentation: Add warning comment to DeleteActionMapping implementation
- Safe Delete: Consider adding bulk delete method that handles ordering automatically
Related Code
- SDK Bridge:
ConfigurationServiceImplementation.cs- DeleteActionMapping method - Python Test:
comprehensive_crud_test.py- Lines 436-449 - Server Manager:
server_manager.py- delete_action_mapping function
Status
- Bug identified
- Root cause analyzed
- Fix implemented in test code
- SDK Bridge bulk delete helper (future enhancement)
- Test with restored configuration
- Verify fix works correctly