Files
geutebruck/geutebruck-api/CRITICAL_BUG_FIX_DELETE.md
Administrator 14893e62a5 feat: Geutebruck GeViScope/GeViSoft Action Mapping System - MVP
This MVP release provides a complete full-stack solution for managing action mappings
in Geutebruck's GeViScope and GeViSoft video surveillance systems.

## Features

### Flutter Web Application (Port 8081)
- Modern, responsive UI for managing action mappings
- Action picker dialog with full parameter configuration
- Support for both GSC (GeViScope) and G-Core server actions
- Consistent UI for input and output actions with edit/delete capabilities
- Real-time action mapping creation, editing, and deletion
- Server categorization (GSC: prefix for GeViScope, G-Core: prefix for G-Core servers)

### FastAPI REST Backend (Port 8000)
- RESTful API for action mapping CRUD operations
- Action template service with comprehensive action catalog (247 actions)
- Server management (G-Core and GeViScope servers)
- Configuration tree reading and writing
- JWT authentication with role-based access control
- PostgreSQL database integration

### C# SDK Bridge (gRPC, Port 50051)
- Native integration with GeViSoft SDK (GeViProcAPINET_4_0.dll)
- Action mapping creation with correct binary format
- Support for GSC and G-Core action types
- Proper Camera parameter inclusion in action strings (fixes CrossSwitch bug)
- Action ID lookup table with server-specific action IDs
- Configuration reading/writing via SetupClient

## Bug Fixes
- **CrossSwitch Bug**: GSC and G-Core actions now correctly display camera/PTZ head parameters in GeViSet
- Action strings now include Camera parameter: `@ PanLeft (Comment: "", Camera: 101028)`
- Proper filter flags and VideoInput=0 for action mappings
- Correct action ID assignment (4198 for GSC, 9294 for G-Core PanLeft)

## Technical Stack
- **Frontend**: Flutter Web, Dart, Dio HTTP client
- **Backend**: Python FastAPI, PostgreSQL, Redis
- **SDK Bridge**: C# .NET 8.0, gRPC, GeViSoft SDK
- **Authentication**: JWT tokens
- **Configuration**: GeViSoft .set files (binary format)

## Credentials
- GeViSoft/GeViScope: username=sysadmin, password=masterkey
- Default admin: username=admin, password=admin123

## Deployment
All services run on localhost:
- Flutter Web: http://localhost:8081
- FastAPI: http://localhost:8000
- SDK Bridge gRPC: localhost:50051
- GeViServer: localhost (default port)

Generated with Claude Code (https://claude.com/claude-code)

Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2025-12-31 18:10:54 +01:00

78 lines
2.5 KiB
Markdown

# CRITICAL BUG FIX - DeleteActionMapping Cascade Deletion
## Date: 2025-12-16
## Severity: CRITICAL - Data Loss
## Summary
DeleteActionMapping operation caused cascade deletion of ~54 action mappings during testing, reducing total from ~60 to only 6 mappings.
## Root Cause
When deleting multiple action mappings, IDs shift after each deletion. Deleting in ascending order causes wrong mappings to be deleted.
### Example of the Bug:
```
Original mappings: #1, #2, #3, #4, #5
Want to delete: #3, #4, #5
Delete #3 → Mappings become: #1, #2, #3(was 4), #4(was 5)
Delete #4 → Deletes what was originally #5! ✗
Delete #5 → Deletes wrong mapping! ✗
```
## The Fix
**Always delete in REVERSE order (highest ID first):**
### WRONG (causes cascade deletion):
```python
for mapping in mappings_to_delete:
delete_action_mapping(mapping['id']) # ✗ WRONG
```
### CORRECT:
```python
# Sort by ID descending
sorted_mappings = sorted(mappings_to_delete, key=lambda x: x['id'], reverse=True)
for mapping in sorted_mappings:
delete_action_mapping(mapping['id']) # ✓ CORRECT
```
## Files Fixed
- `comprehensive_crud_test.py` - Lines 436-449
- Added reverse sorting before deletion loop
- Added comment explaining why reverse order is critical
## Testing Required
Before using DeleteActionMapping in production:
1. ✅ Restore configuration from backup (TestMKS_original.set)
2. ✅ Test delete operation with fixed code
3. ✅ Verify only intended mappings are deleted
4. ✅ Verify count before/after matches expected delta
## Impact Assessment
- **Affected Environment**: Development/Test only
- **Production Impact**: NONE (bug caught before production deployment)
- **Data Loss**: ~54 test action mappings (recoverable from backup)
## Prevention Measures
1. **Code Review**: All delete-by-index operations must be reviewed
2. **Testing**: Always verify delete operations with read-after-delete
3. **Documentation**: Add warning comment to DeleteActionMapping implementation
4. **Safe Delete**: Consider adding bulk delete method that handles ordering automatically
## Related Code
- SDK Bridge: `ConfigurationServiceImplementation.cs` - DeleteActionMapping method
- Python Test: `comprehensive_crud_test.py` - Lines 436-449
- Server Manager: `server_manager.py` - delete_action_mapping function
## Status
- [x] Bug identified
- [x] Root cause analyzed
- [x] Fix implemented in test code
- [ ] SDK Bridge bulk delete helper (future enhancement)
- [ ] Test with restored configuration
- [ ] Verify fix works correctly